↓ Skip to main content

Virtual reality microscope versus conventional microscope regarding time to diagnosis: an experimental study

Overview of attention for article published in Histopathology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Virtual reality microscope versus conventional microscope regarding time to diagnosis: an experimental study
Published in
Histopathology, August 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2012.04323.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

  To create and evaluate a virtual reality (VR) microscope that is as efficient as the conventional microscope, seeking to support the introduction of digital slides into routine practice.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Sweden 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 65 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Researcher 11 16%
Other 7 10%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 16 23%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 25%
Computer Science 15 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Engineering 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 13 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2012.
All research outputs
#13,863,396
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from Histopathology
#1,738
of 3,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,574
of 173,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histopathology
#12
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,434 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.