↓ Skip to main content

ゲームとして経験を語る場における過剰な意味の創出 ―RPG型図書館ガイダンス・プログラムにおけるグループ・ディスカッションの会話分析―

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ゲームとして経験を語る場における過剰な意味の創出 ―RPG型図書館ガイダンス・プログラムにおけるグループ・ディスカッションの会話分析―
Published in
Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, December 2018
DOI 10.11225/jcss.25.375
Authors

石田 喜美, 名城 邦孝, 関 敦央, 宮崎 雅幸, 寺島 哲平

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,942,734
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society
#95
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,337
of 445,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.