↓ Skip to main content

Rapid-access, high-throughput synchrotron crystallography for drug discovery

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Rapid-access, high-throughput synchrotron crystallography for drug discovery
Published in
Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, April 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.tips.2012.03.009
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Synchrotron X-ray sources provide the highest quality crystallographic data for structure-guided drug design. In general, industrial utilization of such sources has been intermittent and occasionally limited. The Lilly Research Laboratories Collaborative Access Team (LRL-CAT) beamline provides a unique alternative to traditional synchrotron use by pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. Crystallographic experiments at LRL-CAT and the results therefrom are integrated directly into the drug discovery process, permitting structural data, including screening of fragment libraries, to be routinely and rapidly used on a daily basis as part of pharmaceutical lead discovery and optimization. Here we describe how LRL-CAT acquires and disseminates the results from protein crystallography to maximize their impact on the development of new potential medicines.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 45 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Student > Master 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Other 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 29%
Chemistry 10 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2012.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Pharmacological Sciences
#2,278
of 2,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,242
of 174,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Pharmacological Sciences
#25
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.