↓ Skip to main content

Coarse-grained simulation reveals key features of HIV-1 capsid self-assembly

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Coarse-grained simulation reveals key features of HIV-1 capsid self-assembly
Published in
Nature Communications, May 2016
DOI 10.1038/ncomms11568
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The maturation of HIV-1 viral particles is essential for viral infectivity. During maturation, many copies of the capsid protein (CA) self-assemble into a capsid shell to enclose the viral RNA. The mechanistic details of the initiation and early stages of capsid assembly remain to be delineated. We present coarse-grained simulations of capsid assembly under various conditions, considering not only capsid lattice self-assembly but also the potential disassembly of capsid upon delivery to the cytoplasm of a target cell. The effects of CA concentration, molecular crowding, and the conformational variability of CA are described, with results indicating that capsid nucleation and growth is a multi-stage process requiring well-defined metastable intermediates. Generation of the mature capsid lattice is sensitive to local conditions, with relatively subtle changes in CA concentration and molecular crowding influencing self-assembly and the ensemble of structural morphologies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Unknown 174 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 28%
Researcher 37 21%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 32 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 22%
Chemistry 32 18%
Physics and Astronomy 18 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 10%
Engineering 10 6%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 40 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2021.
All research outputs
#622,365
of 28,752,327 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#10,654
of 69,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,071
of 318,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#179
of 845 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,752,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 845 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.