↓ Skip to main content

Uncovering social structures and informational prejudices to reduce inequity in delivery and uptake of new molecular technologies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Ethics, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Uncovering social structures and informational prejudices to reduce inequity in delivery and uptake of new molecular technologies
Published in
Journal of Medical Ethics, January 2020
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2019-105734
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Other 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Researcher 2 5%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 18 49%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Social Sciences 5 14%
Psychology 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 18 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,738,413
of 28,812,439 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#2,040
of 3,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,231
of 489,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#36
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,812,439 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 489,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.