↓ Skip to main content

Retropubic Midurethral Sling Colonization With Staphylococcus lugdunensis

Overview of attention for article published in Urogynecology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Retropubic Midurethral Sling Colonization With Staphylococcus lugdunensis
Published in
Urogynecology, May 2016
DOI 10.1097/spv.0000000000000281
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We present a case of Staphylococcus lugdunensis colonization of a midurethral sling. Staphylococcus lugdunensis is a common skin colonizer and has been isolated in cases of implanted prosthetic devices. A 52-year-old female presented with suprapubic pain and recurrent urinary tract infections with S. lugdunensis starting 3 months after a retropubic sling procedure. After several months of continued pain and a suspicion of a mesh-related infection, the sling was removed. Culture of the sling material grew oxacillin-susceptible S. lugdunensis. Her symptoms resolved after sling removal and a postoperative course of antibiotics. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of S. lugdunensis colonization of vaginal mesh. Surgeons should be aware and knowledgeable about the possible complications arising from insertion of midurethral slings.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 35%
Environmental Science 2 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2016.
All research outputs
#28,640,943
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Urogynecology
#1,208
of 1,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,301
of 336,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Urogynecology
#14
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.