| Title |
Editorial: Harm‐free care or harm‐free environments: expanding our definitions and understandings of safety in health care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Nursing, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jocn.13378 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
In recent decades there has been no shortage of attention to the hazards and risks of healthcare. The sustained attention to prevent, or at least minimize, harm to patients has seen an international drive for 'cultures of safety' and 'harm-free care'. These approaches place emphasis on reducing harm, rather than individual blame and disciplinary measures for staff (HQ 2015, ACSQH 2015, NHS 2014), with increased attention to organisational structures, clinical competence and communication to prevent harm. While concerted effort has been given to reducing patient harm, what remains unclear is the definition of harm, what types of harm are preventable, and the scale of preventable harms. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 46% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 13% |
| Ireland | 2 | 8% |
| Australia | 2 | 8% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 29% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 10 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 15% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |