↓ Skip to main content

A series of unfortunate events: characterizing the contingent nature of physiological extremes using long-term environmental records

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A series of unfortunate events: characterizing the contingent nature of physiological extremes using long-term environmental records
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, January 2020
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2019.2333
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 22%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 53%
Environmental Science 6 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#10,322,282
of 34,377,743 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#8,338
of 12,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,518
of 521,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#101
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,377,743 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 521,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.