You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
GPS発信機によるコクガンの渡りルート解明 ―雁の里親友の会―
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annual Report of Pro Natura Foundation Japan, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.32215/pronatura.28.0_81 |
Authors |
澤 祐介, 池内 俊雄, 田村 智恵子, 嶋田 哲郎, Ward David, Lei Cao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2020.
All research outputs
#16,057,393
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Annual Report of Pro Natura Foundation Japan
#18
of 24 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,860
of 473,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Report of Pro Natura Foundation Japan
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.