↓ Skip to main content

Explaining the rise of ‘nonreligion studies’: Subfield formation and institutionalization within the sociology of religion

Overview of attention for article published in Social Compass, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 259)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Explaining the rise of ‘nonreligion studies’: Subfield formation and institutionalization within the sociology of religion
Published in
Social Compass, January 2020
DOI 10.1177/0037768619894815
Authors

Stephen Bullivant

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 5 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 47%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 11%
Arts and Humanities 2 11%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,774,606
of 25,216,325 outputs
Outputs from Social Compass
#43
of 259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,623
of 471,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Compass
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,216,325 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 471,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.