↓ Skip to main content

Relationship Between Ventricular Morphology and Aqueductal Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow in Healthy and Communicating Hydrocephalus

Overview of attention for article published in Investigative Radiology, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Relationship Between Ventricular Morphology and Aqueductal Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow in Healthy and Communicating Hydrocephalus
Published in
Investigative Radiology, April 2009
DOI 10.1097/rli.0b013e31819a640b
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Differences in the magnitude of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volumetric flow through the cerebral aqueduct between healthy and hydrocephalic patients have been previously reported. However it is not clear whether this is directly related to the pathophysiology or secondary to altered ventricular morphology and hydrodynamics. This work aims to determine the role of anatomic and hydrodynamic factors in modulating the magnitude of CSF flow through the aqueduct.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
India 1 1%
Unknown 66 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 15 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 43%
Engineering 9 13%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 18 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2012.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Investigative Radiology
#1,598
of 2,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,973
of 107,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Investigative Radiology
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.