↓ Skip to main content

A measure for quantifying the impact of housing quality on respiratory health: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A measure for quantifying the impact of housing quality on respiratory health: a cross-sectional study
Published in
Environmental Health, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1476-069x-11-33
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Damp and mould in homes have been established as risk factors for respiratory health. There is a need for a relatively straightforward assessment of the home that quantifies this risk.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 152 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Student > Postgraduate 20 13%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 31 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Engineering 13 8%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Environmental Science 7 5%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 42 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2022.
All research outputs
#5,487,668
of 26,542,140 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#742
of 1,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,335
of 178,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#18
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,542,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.