↓ Skip to main content

Can negative attitudes toward patients with borderline personality disorder be changed? The effect of attending a STEPPS workshop.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Personality Disorders, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Can negative attitudes toward patients with borderline personality disorder be changed? The effect of attending a STEPPS workshop.
Published in
Journal of Personality Disorders, December 2011
DOI 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.6.806
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We sought to determine whether negative attitudes toward patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) can be modified through education. Mental health clinicians attended a 1-day workshop on the Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) group treatment program for BPD. A questionnaire to assess attitudes towards BPD was given to 271 clinicians before and after the workshop. Following the workshop, clinicians endorsed having significantly greater empathy toward patients with BPD, and having greater awareness of the distress and low self-esteem associated with the disorder. Significant improvement was seen in the clinicians' attitudes toward patients with BPD and their desire to work with them. Clinicians were significantly less likely to express dislike for BPD patients. They also reported feeling more competent in their ability to treat these patients. The study offers preliminary evidence that negative attitudes toward patients with BPD can be modified through education.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 121 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 12%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 28 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 51 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 11%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 30 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2012.
All research outputs
#24,757,289
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Personality Disorders
#573
of 902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,578
of 302,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Personality Disorders
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.