↓ Skip to main content

Cause Lawyering and Movement Tactics: Disability Rights Movements in South Korea and Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Law & Policy, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cause Lawyering and Movement Tactics: Disability Rights Movements in South Korea and Japan
Published in
Law & Policy, January 2020
DOI 10.1111/lapo.12141
Authors

Celeste L. Arrington, Yong‐Il Moon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 32%
Lecturer 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 53%
Arts and Humanities 2 11%
Psychology 2 11%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2020.
All research outputs
#14,939,504
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from Law & Policy
#177
of 218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,500
of 451,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Law & Policy
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.