You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development and Practical Test of Quality Indicators for Palliative Care in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation Journal, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1253/circj.cj-19-0225 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yasuhiro Hamatani, Yasuko Takada, Yoshihiro Miyamoto, Yukie Kawano, Yuta Anchi, Tatsuhiro Shibata, Atsushi Suzuki, Mitsunori Nishikawa, Hiroto Ito, Masashi Kato, Tsuyoshi Shiga, Yoshihiro Fukumoto, Chisato Izumi, Satoshi Yasuda, Hisao Ogawa, Yasuo Sugano, Toshihisa Anzai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 43% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 22% |
| Unknown | 27 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,439,082
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#88
of 2,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,355
of 470,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.