↓ Skip to main content

Phylogeography, genetic stocks, and conservation implications for an Australian endemic marine turtle

Overview of attention for article published in Aquatic Conservation, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Phylogeography, genetic stocks, and conservation implications for an Australian endemic marine turtle
Published in
Aquatic Conservation, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/aqc.3270
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Other 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 28 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 20 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 31 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2023.
All research outputs
#23,230,464
of 34,297,219 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Conservation
#1,612
of 2,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,101
of 518,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Conservation
#30
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,297,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.