↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Identification and Characterization of LIN‐2(CASK) as a Regulator of Kinesin‐3 UNC‐104(KIF1A) Motility and Clustering in Neurons
Published in
Traffic, June 2016
DOI 10.1111/tra.12413
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Kinesin-3 UNC-104(KIF1A) is the major axonal transporter of synaptic vesicles. Employing yeast two-hybrid and co-immunoprecipitation assays, we characterized a LIN-2(CASK) binding site overlapping with that of reported UNC-104 activator protein SYD-2(Liprin-α) on the motor's stalk domain. We identified the L27 and GUK domains of LIN-2 to be the most critical interaction domains for UNC-104. Further, we demonstrated that the L27 domain interacts with the SAM domains of SYD-2, while the GUK domain is able to interact with both the coiled coils and SAM domains of SYD-2. LIN-2 and SYD-2 co-localize in C. elegans neurons and display interactions using BiFC (bimolecular fluorescence complementation) assays. UNC-104 motor motility and SNB-1(Synaptobrevin-1) cargo transport are largely diminished in neurons of LIN-2 knockout worms, which cannot be compensated by overexpressing SYD-2. The absence of the motor-activating function of LIN-2 results in increased motor clustering along axons, thus retaining SNB-1 cargo in cell bodies. LIN-2 and SYD-2 both positively affect the velocity of UNC-104, however, only LIN-2 is able to efficiently elevate the motor's run lengths. From our study, we conclude that LIN-2 and SYD-2 act in a functional complex to regulate the motor with LIN-2 being the more prominent activator.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 24%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 21%
Neuroscience 6 16%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2017.
All research outputs
#19,177,100
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Traffic
#1,036
of 1,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,722
of 345,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Traffic
#15
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,253 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.