↓ Skip to main content

What Is Vitamin D Insufficiency? And Does It Matter?

Overview of attention for article published in Calcified Tissue International, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
What Is Vitamin D Insufficiency? And Does It Matter?
Published in
Calcified Tissue International, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00223-012-9605-6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The term nutrient "insufficiency," as commonly used, refers to a nutritional status intermediate between classical, severe deficiency, and full normal. As both "deficiency" and "insufficiency" are causes of dysfunction and disease, there is no biological basis for a distinction between them. What is important to note is that, in the case of vitamin D, the preponderance of the evidence indicates that there is real, preventable disease in the range of vitamin D status values now labeled "insufficient."

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 40 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Other 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 12%
Professor 4 9%
Other 13 30%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2014.
All research outputs
#11,008,083
of 32,375,021 outputs
Outputs from Calcified Tissue International
#787
of 2,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,763
of 202,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Calcified Tissue International
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,375,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.