↓ Skip to main content

Fundoscopy-directed genetic testing to re-evaluate negative whole exome sequencing results

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Fundoscopy-directed genetic testing to re-evaluate negative whole exome sequencing results
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13023-020-1312-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 16 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Unspecified 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 22 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2020.
All research outputs
#18,047,943
of 23,191,112 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2,049
of 2,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,663
of 451,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#36
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,191,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.