↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Blood Cytokine Profiles Associated with Distinct Patterns of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia among Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants
Published in
Journal of Pediatrics, April 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.03.058
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carl T. D'Angio, Namasivayam Ambalavanan, Waldemar A. Carlo, Scott A. McDonald, Kristin Skogstrand, David M. Hougaard, Seetha Shankaran, Ronald N. Goldberg, Richard A. Ehrenkranz, Jon E. Tyson, Barbara J. Stoll, Abhik Das, Rosemary D. Higgins, Abhik Das, Scott A. McDonald, Alan H. Jobe, R. Laptook, William Oh, Lewis P. Rubin, Angelita M. Hensman, Avroy A. Fanaroff, Michele C. Walsh, Nancy S. Newman, Bonnie S. Siner, Edward F. Donovan, Vivek Narendran, Barbara Alexander, Cathy Grisby, Jody Hessling, Marcia Worley Mersmann, Holly L. Mincey, C. Michael Cotten, Kathy J. Auten, Ellen C. Hale, Linda L. Wright, Sumner J. Yaffe, Elizabeth M. McClure, Brenda B. Poindexter, James A. Lemons, Diana D. Appel, Dianne E. Herron, Leslie D. Wilson, W. Kenneth Poole, Betty K. Hastings, Kristin M. Zaterka-Baxter, Jeanette O'Donnell Auman, Scott E. Schaefer, David K. Stevenson, Krisa P. Van Meurs, M. Bethany Ball, Kristin Skogstrand, David M. Hougaard, Monica V. Collins, Shirley S. Cosby, Neil N. Finer, Maynard R. Rasmussen, David Kaegi, Kathy Arnell, Clarence Demetrio, Wade Rich, Charles R. Bauer, Shahnaz Duara, Ruth Everett-Thomas, Lu-Ann Papile, Conra Backstrom Lacy, Sheldon B. Korones, Henrietta S. Bada, Tina Hudson, R. Laptook, Walid A. Salhab, Susie Madison, Kathleen A. Kennedy, Brenda H. Morris, Esther G. Akpa, Patty A. Cluff, Claudia I. Franco, Anna E. Lis, Georgia E. McDavid, Patti Pierce Tate, T. Michael O'Shea, Nancy J. Peters, G. Ganesh Konduri, Rebecca Bara, Geraldine Muran, Patricia Gettner, Monica Konstantino, JoAnn Poulsen

Abstract

To explore differences in blood cytokine profiles among distinct bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) patterns. We evaluated blood spots collected from 943 infants born at ≤1000 g and surviving to 28 days on postnatal days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21 for 25 cytokines. Infants were assigned to the following lung disease patterns: (1) no lung disease (NLD); (2) respiratory distress syndrome without BPD; (3) classic BPD (persistent exposure to supplemental oxygen until 28 days of age); or (4) atypical BPD (period without supplemental oxygen before 28 days). Median cytokine levels for infants with BPD were compared with the IQR of results among infants with NLD. The distribution of enrolled infants by group was as follows: 69 (NLD), 73 (respiratory distress syndrome), 381 (classic BPD), and 160 (atypical BPD). The remaining 260 infants could not be classified because of missing data (104) or not fitting a predefined pattern (156). Median levels of 3 cytokines (elevated interleukin [IL]-8, matrix metalloproteinase-9; decreased granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor) fell outside the IQR for at least 2 time points in both infants with atypical and classic BPD. Profiles of 7 cytokines (IL-6, IL-10, IL-18, macrophage inflammatory protein-1α, C-reactive protein, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted) differed between infants with classic and atypical BPD. Blood cytokine profiles may differ between infants developing classic and atypical BPD. These dissimilarities suggest the possibility that differing mechanisms could explain the varied patterns of pathophysiology of lung disease in extremely premature infants.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 81 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Other 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 23 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 34%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 27 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2026.
All research outputs
#11,327,924
of 34,593,328 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatrics
#7,285
of 15,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,445
of 339,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatrics
#67
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,593,328 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.