↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Choroidal Thickness Measurements Using Semiautomated and Manual Segmentation Methods

Overview of attention for article published in Optometry and Vision Science, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparison of Choroidal Thickness Measurements Using Semiautomated and Manual Segmentation Methods
Published in
Optometry and Vision Science, February 2020
DOI 10.1097/opx.0000000000001473
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 12 48%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2020.
All research outputs
#24,535,167
of 29,846,098 outputs
Outputs from Optometry and Vision Science
#1,936
of 2,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#373,559
of 488,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Optometry and Vision Science
#14
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,846,098 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 488,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.