↓ Skip to main content

Measuring Microsatellite Conservation in Mammalian Evolution with a Phylogenetic Birth–Death Model

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology & Evolution, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Measuring Microsatellite Conservation in Mammalian Evolution with a Phylogenetic Birth–Death Model
Published in
Genome Biology & Evolution, May 2012
DOI 10.1093/gbe/evs050
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Microsatellites make up ∼3% of the human genome, and there is increasing evidence that some microsatellites can have important functions and can be conserved by selection. To investigate this conservation, we performed a genome-wide analysis of human microsatellites and measured their conservation using a binary character birth--death model on a mammalian phylogeny. Using a maximum likelihood method to estimate birth and death rates for different types of microsatellites, we show that the rates at which microsatellites are gained and lost in mammals depend on their sequence composition, length, and position in the genome. Additionally, we use a mixture model to account for unequal death rates among microsatellites across the human genome. We use this model to assign a probability-based conservation score to each microsatellite. We found that microsatellites near the transcription start sites of genes are often highly conserved, and that distance from a microsatellite to the nearest transcription start site is a good predictor of the microsatellite conservation score. An analysis of gene ontology terms for genes that contain microsatellites near their transcription start site reveals that regulatory genes involved in growth and development are highly enriched with conserved microsatellites.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 53 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Student > Master 8 14%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 12%
Mathematics 2 3%
Computer Science 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 8 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2012.
All research outputs
#28,640,943
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology & Evolution
#3,414
of 3,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,613
of 213,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology & Evolution
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.