↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of MASTERGRAFT PUTTY as a Graft Extender in a Rabbit Posterolateral Fusion Model

Overview of attention for article published in Spine, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Assessment of MASTERGRAFT PUTTY as a Graft Extender in a Rabbit Posterolateral Fusion Model
Published in
Spine, May 2012
DOI 10.1097/brs.0b013e31824444c4
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Randomized, controlled study in a laboratory setting. Blinded observations/assessment of study outcomes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Unknown 30 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 28%
Other 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Chemical Engineering 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Materials Science 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 11 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2013.
All research outputs
#15,517,312
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Spine
#5,072
of 8,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,156
of 175,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Spine
#33
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.