↓ Skip to main content

Coding female genital mutilation/cutting and its complications using the International Classification of Diseases: a commentary

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Coding female genital mutilation/cutting and its complications using the International Classification of Diseases: a commentary
Published in
British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, February 2020
DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.16086
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Librarian 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 14 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 16%
Computer Science 1 3%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 17 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2020.
All research outputs
#21,774,144
of 34,841,472 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#6,614
of 8,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,125
of 521,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#64
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,841,472 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 521,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.