↓ Skip to main content

CRISPR/Cas9 increases mitotic gene conversion in human cells

Overview of attention for article published in Gene Therapy, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
CRISPR/Cas9 increases mitotic gene conversion in human cells
Published in
Gene Therapy, February 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41434-020-0126-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Parisa Javidi-Parsijani, Pin Lyu, Vishruti Makani, Walaa Mohamed Sarhan, Kyung Whan Yoo, Lobna El-Korashi, Anthony Atala, Baisong Lu

Abstract

Gene conversion is a process of transferring genetic material from one homologous sequence to another. Most reported gene conversions are meiotic although mitotic gene conversion is also described. When using CRISPR/Cas9 to target the human hemoglobin subunit beta (HBB) gene, hemoglobin subunit delta (HBD) gene footprints were observed in HBB gene. However, it is unclear whether these were the results of gene conversion or PCR-mediated sequence shuffling between highly homologous sequences. Here we provide evidence that the HBD footprints in HBB were indeed results of gene conversion. We demonstrated that the CRISPR/Cas9 facilitated unidirectional sequence transfer from the homologous gene without double-strand breaks (DSB) to the one with DSBs, and showed that the rates of HBD footprint in HBB were positively correlated to the HBB insertion and deletion rates. We further showed that when targeting HBD gene, HBB footprints could also be observed in HBD gene. The mitotic gene conversion was observed not only in immortalized HEK293T cells, but also in human primary cells. Our work reveals mitotic gene conversion as an often overlooked effect of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 31%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2020.
All research outputs
#15,332,207
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Gene Therapy
#2,802
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,084
of 452,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gene Therapy
#17
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.