↓ Skip to main content

Statistical Guidelines for Handling Missing Data in Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Research

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurotrauma, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 3,342)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
29 news outlets
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Statistical Guidelines for Handling Missing Data in Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Research
Published in
Journal of Neurotrauma, August 2021
DOI 10.1089/neu.2019.6702
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica L. Nielson, Shelly R. Cooper, Seth A. Seabury, Davide Luciani, Anthony Fabio, Nancy R. Temkin, Adam R. Ferguson, Opeolu Adeoye, Neeraj Badjatia, Kim Boase, Yelena Bodien, M. Ross Bullock, Randall Chesnut, John D. Corrigan, Karen Crawford, Ramon Diaz-Arrastia, Sureyya Dikmen, Ann-Christine Duhaime, Richard Ellenbogen, V Ramana Feeser, Brandon Foreman, Raquel Gardner, Etienne Gaudette, Joseph Giacino, Dana Goldman, Luis Gonzalez, Shankar Gopinath, Rao Gullapalli, J Claude Hemphill, Gillian Hotz, Sonia Jain, Frederick K. Korley, Joel Kramer, Natalie Kreitzer, Harvey Levin, Chris Lindsell, Joan Machamer, Christopher Madden, Geoffrey T. Manley, Alastair Martin, Thomas McAllister, Michael McCrea, Randall Merchant, Pratik Mukherjee, Lindsay Nelson, Laura B. Ngwenya, Florence Noel, David Okonkwo, Eva Palacios, Daniel Perl, Ava Puccio, Miri Rabinowitz, Claudia Robertson, Jonathan Rosand, Angelle Sander, Gabriella Satris, David Schnyer, Mark Sherer, Murray Stein, Sabrina Taylor, Arthur Toga, Alex Valadka, Mary Vassar, Paul Vespa, Kevin Wang, John K. Yue, Esther Yuh, Ross Zafonte

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 25 47%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Psychology 5 9%
Neuroscience 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 28 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 231. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2020.
All research outputs
#206,187
of 34,307,719 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurotrauma
#19
of 3,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,671
of 462,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurotrauma
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,307,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.