↓ Skip to main content

Tinnitus Retraining Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Ear and hearing (Print), September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Tinnitus Retraining Therapy
Published in
Ear and hearing (Print), September 2012
DOI 10.1097/aud.0b013e31824f2a6e
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Habituation to tinnitus cannot occur with total masking, an argument made by proponents of "tinnitus retraining therapy." We also compared the effectiveness of retraining therapy with mixing-point masking, total masking, and with counseling alone.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Italy 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 64 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 21%
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 12%
Engineering 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 20 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2022.
All research outputs
#6,630,674
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Ear and hearing (Print)
#360
of 2,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,138
of 226,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ear and hearing (Print)
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.