↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of Cryptosporidium species in recreational versus non-recreational water sources

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Parasitology, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Prevalence of Cryptosporidium species in recreational versus non-recreational water sources
Published in
Experimental Parasitology, May 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.exppara.2012.04.015
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Cryptosporidiosis, caused by the protozoan parasite Cryptosporidium, represents the major public health concern of water utilities in developed nations due to its small size, resistance to disinfection and ability to be shed in large numbers in faeces. In Australia, recreational access is not allowed on direct supply sources, however, in Western Australia, limited recreational access to drinking water catchments has been allowed, although only in the outer catchment. Recreational activities within 2 km of the drinking water body is prohibited. The present study compared the amount, prevalence and species of Cryptosporidium in recreational versus non-recreational water catchments in the south west of Western Australia (WA). Recreational water catchments, which allowed swimming and camping had a higher prevalence of Cryptosporidium and the majority of samples were the human-associated C. hominis. Non-recreational catchments had a lower prevalence and all the samples genotyped were C. parvum. Risk analysis identified increasing population as strongly correlated with an increase in the prevalence of Cryptosporidium in recreational catchments. This suggests that recreational access to drinking water catchments is a serious public health risk and government policy limiting activities to the outer catchment should be supported.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Malaysia 1 2%
Unknown 56 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 7%
Environmental Science 4 7%
Other 15 25%
Unknown 17 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2012.
All research outputs
#18,349,432
of 26,876,492 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Parasitology
#1,199
of 1,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,691
of 179,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Parasitology
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,876,492 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.