↓ Skip to main content

上州の在村剣術馬庭念流と武芸のネットワーク

Overview of attention for article published in The Japan Journal of Sport History, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
上州の在村剣術馬庭念流と武芸のネットワーク
Published in
The Japan Journal of Sport History, June 2018
DOI 10.19010/jjshjb.30.0_41
Authors

高橋 敏

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,360,834
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from The Japan Journal of Sport History
#6
of 25 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,055
of 342,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japan Journal of Sport History
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 19 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them