↓ Skip to main content

Shapes on a plane: evaluating the impact of projection distortion on spatial binning

Overview of attention for article published in Cartography and Geographic Information Science, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 344)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shapes on a plane: evaluating the impact of projection distortion on spatial binning
Published in
Cartography and Geographic Information Science, May 2016
DOI 10.1080/15230406.2016.1180263
Authors

Sarah E. Battersby, Daniel “daan” Strebe, Michael P. Finn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 26%
Social Sciences 8 21%
Engineering 5 13%
Computer Science 4 10%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,344,839
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from Cartography and Geographic Information Science
#45
of 344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,361
of 332,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cartography and Geographic Information Science
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.