↓ Skip to main content

Systemic hypothermia improves histological and functional outcome after cervical spinal cord contusion in rats

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Comparative Neurology, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Systemic hypothermia improves histological and functional outcome after cervical spinal cord contusion in rats
Published in
The Journal of Comparative Neurology, April 2009
DOI 10.1002/cne.22014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 17%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 20 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 34%
Neuroscience 8 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Engineering 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 23 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2016.
All research outputs
#24,893,066
of 34,517,289 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Comparative Neurology
#3,425
of 4,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,464
of 151,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Comparative Neurology
#22
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,517,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,545 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.