↓ Skip to main content

Using Video Social Stories™ to Increase Task Engagement for Middle School Students With Autism Spectrum Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Modification, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Using Video Social Stories™ to Increase Task Engagement for Middle School Students With Autism Spectrum Disorders
Published in
Behavior Modification, May 2012
DOI 10.1177/0145445512442683
Pubmed ID
Authors

David F. Cihak, Laura K. Kildare, Catherine C. Smith, Don D. McMahon, Luella Quinn-Brown

Abstract

Four middle school students with autism spectrum disorders participated in a brief functional analysis and a video Social Stories™ intervention to remediate attention-seeking and task-avoidance behaviors. Results indicated that matching video Social Stories™ to specific functions of behaviors increased task-engagement behaviors in the general education classroom for all students. In addition, special and general education teachers, as well as participating students, reported favorable social acceptability of the intervention.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 144 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Researcher 12 8%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 41 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 32 22%
Psychology 28 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 5%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 45 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2013.
All research outputs
#17,612,860
of 28,257,452 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Modification
#425
of 616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,998
of 183,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Modification
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,257,452 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.