Artificial vessel grafts are often used for the treatment of occluded blood vessels, but neointimal lesions commonly occur. To both elucidate and quantify which cell types contribute to the developing neointima, we established a novel mouse model of restenosis by grafting a decellularized vessel to the carotid artery. Typically, the graft developed neointimal lesions after 2 weeks, resulting in lumen closure within 4 weeks. Immunohistochemical staining revealed the presence of endothelial and smooth muscle cells, monocytes, and stem/progenitor cells at 2 weeks after implantation. Explanted cultures of neointimal tissues displayed heterogeneous outgrowth in stem cell medium. These lesional cells expressed a panel of stem/progenitor markers, including c-kit, stem cell antigen-1 (Sca-1), and CD34. Furthermore, these cells showed clonogenic and multilineage differentiation capacities. Isolated Sca-1(+) cells were able to differentiate into endothelial and smooth muscle cells in response to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-BB stimulation in vitro. In vivo, local application of VEGF to the adventitial side of the decellularized vessel increased re-endothelialization and reduced neointimal formation in samples at 4 weeks after implantation. A population of stem/progenitor cells exists within developing neointima, which displays the ability to differentiate into both endothelial and smooth muscle cells and can contribute to restenosis. Our findings also indicate that drugs or cytokines that direct cell differentiation toward an endothelial lineage may be effective tools in the prevention or delay of restenosis.
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
2
4%
Business, Management and Accounting
1
2%
Other
2
4%
Unknown
19
41%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2019.
All research outputs
#11,901,090
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Pathology
#4,417
of 9,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,824
of 213,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Pathology
#32
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
