↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive and volumetric predictors of response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) — A prospective follow-up study

Overview of attention for article published in Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging Section, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cognitive and volumetric predictors of response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) — A prospective follow-up study
Published in
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging Section, May 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2012.02.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

As the prevalence of treatment resistant depression (TRD) continues to rise, it remains a clinically important issue to identify neurobiological-, patient- and treatment-related factors that could potentially predict response to treatment. Medial temporal lobe (MTL) structures, in particular the hippocampus and amygdala have been implicated in inferior treatment response. The role of related structures such as the entorhinal cortex and the impact of MTL abnormalities on neurocognitive function, however, have not been systematically examined. The current study investigated MTL abnormalities and neurocognitive characteristics of eventual treatment responders and non-responders to a course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in order to identify potential predictors of treatment outcome. Prior to rTMS treatment all patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and neuropsychological assessment. MRI analysis was conducted using FreeSurfer 5.0. There was a 50% response rate following up to a 6-week course of daily rTMS treatments. Treatment response was defined as 50% reduction in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and BDI-II scores from baseline. There was no difference in pre-treatment neurocognitive profiles and MTL volumes between eventual treatment responders and non-responders. Smaller pre-treatment left hippocampus volume showed a trend towards predicting eventual subjective improvement in depressive symptomatology. Although preliminary, our findings suggest that structural abnormalities may have some potential for predicting outcome to rTMS.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 130 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 16%
Student > Master 18 13%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 34 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 21%
Psychology 26 19%
Neuroscience 19 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 40 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2012.
All research outputs
#28,639,288
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging Section
#802
of 1,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,511
of 214,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging Section
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.