↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
364 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Celebrating variability and a call to limit systematisation: the example of the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy and the Behaviour Change Wheel
Published in
Health Psychology Review, August 2016
DOI 10.1080/17437199.2016.1190291
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 361 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 15%
Researcher 43 12%
Student > Bachelor 35 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 3%
Other 40 11%
Unknown 123 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 106 29%
Social Sciences 29 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 6%
Sports and Recreations 12 3%
Other 37 10%
Unknown 134 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2021.
All research outputs
#9,460,197
of 32,432,832 outputs
Outputs from Health Psychology Review
#275
of 407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,802
of 326,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Psychology Review
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,432,832 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.