↓ Skip to main content

Sterilization techniques for biodegradable scaffolds in tissue engineering applications

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Tissue Engineering, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 402)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
6 patents
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
749 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sterilization techniques for biodegradable scaffolds in tissue engineering applications
Published in
Journal of Tissue Engineering, May 2016
DOI 10.1177/2041731416648810
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zheng Dai, Jennifer Ronholm, Yiping Tian, Benu Sethi, Xudong Cao

Abstract

Biodegradable scaffolds have been extensively studied due to their wide applications in biomaterials and tissue engineering. However, infections associated with in vivo use of these scaffolds by different microbiological contaminants remain to be a significant challenge. This review focuses on different sterilization techniques including heat, chemical, irradiation, and other novel sterilization techniques for various biodegradable scaffolds. Comparisons of these techniques, including their sterilization mechanisms, post-sterilization effects, and sterilization efficiencies, are discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 749 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 747 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 121 16%
Student > Bachelor 109 15%
Student > Master 83 11%
Researcher 68 9%
Other 32 4%
Other 66 9%
Unknown 270 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 113 15%
Materials Science 61 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 52 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 7%
Chemical Engineering 42 6%
Other 130 17%
Unknown 299 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2026.
All research outputs
#3,156,087
of 34,089,221 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Tissue Engineering
#25
of 402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,021
of 340,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Tissue Engineering
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,089,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them