↓ Skip to main content

Sensory Cortical Activity Is Related to the Selection of a Rhythmic Motor Action Pattern

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sensory Cortical Activity Is Related to the Selection of a Rhythmic Motor Action Pattern
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, May 2016
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.3949-15.2016
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Rats produce robust, highly distinctive orofacial rhythms in response to taste stimuli-responses that aid in the consumption of palatable tastes and the ejection of aversive tastes, and that are sourced in a multifunctional brainstem central pattern generator. Several pieces of indirect evidence suggest that primary gustatory cortex (GC) may be a part of a distributed forebrain circuit involved in the selection of particular consumption-related rhythms, although not in the production of individual mouth movements per se. Here, we performed a series of tests of this hypothesis. We first examined the temporal relationship between GC activity and orofacial behaviors by performing paired single-neuron and electromyographic recordings in awake rats. Using a trial-by-trial analysis, we found that a subset of GC neurons shows a burst of activity beginning before the transition between nondistinct and taste-specific (i.e., consumption-related) orofacial rhythms. We further showed that shifting the latency of consumption-related behavior by selective cueing has an analogous impact on the timing of GC activity. Finally, we showed the complementary result, demonstrating that optogenetic perturbation of GC activity has a modest but significant impact on the probability that a specific rhythm will be produced in response to a strongly aversive taste. GC appears to be a part of a distributed circuit that governs the selection of taste-induced orofacial rhythms. In many well studied (typically invertebrate) sensorimotor systems, top-down modulation helps motor-control regions "select" movement patterns. Here, we provide evidence that gustatory cortex (GC) may be part of the forebrain circuit that performs this function in relation to oral behaviors ("gapes") whereby a substance in the mouth is rejected as unpalatable. We show that GC palatability coding is well timed to play this role, and that the latency of these codes changes as the latency of gaping shifts with learning. We go on to show that by silencing these neurons, we can change the likelihood of gaping. These data help to break down the sensory/motor divide by showing a role for sensory cortex in the selection of motor behavior.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Unknown 44 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Researcher 9 20%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 17 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 15%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 16 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2016.
All research outputs
#23,324,569
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#17,948
of 23,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,994
of 340,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#206
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.