↓ Skip to main content

Ancient Gene Paralogy May Mislead Inference of Plastid Phylogeny

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Biology and Evolution, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Ancient Gene Paralogy May Mislead Inference of Plastid Phylogeny
Published in
Molecular Biology and Evolution, July 2012
DOI 10.1093/molbev/mss137
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Because of its ancient origin more than 1 billion years ago, the highly reduced plastid genomes of Plantae (e.g., plant chloroplasts) provide limited insights into the initial stages of endosymbiont genome reduction. The photosynthetic amoeba Paulinella provides a more useful model to study this process because its alpha-cyanobacterium-derived plastid originated ∼60 Ma and the genome still contains ∼1,000 genes. Here, we compared and contrasted features associated with genome reduction due to primary endosymbiosis in Paulinella plastids and in marine, free-living strains of the picocyanobacterium, Prochlorococcus. Both types of genomes show gene inactivation, concerted evolution, and contraction of gene families that impact highly conserved single-copy phylogenetic markers in the plastid such as psbA, psbC, and psbD. Our data suggest that these photosystem II genes may provide misleading phylogenetic signal because each of the constituent Plantae lineages has likely undergone a different, independent series of events that led to their reduction to a single copy. This issue is most problematic for resolving basal Plantae relationships when differential plastid gene loss was presumably ongoing, as we observe in Paulinella species. Our work uncovers a key, previously unappreciated aspect of organelle genome reduction and demonstrates "work-in-progress" models such as Paulinella to be critical to gain a fuller understanding of algal and plant genome evolution.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 2 3%
Portugal 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 47 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Professor 10 17%
Student > Master 7 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 72%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2012.
All research outputs
#19,942,887
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Biology and Evolution
#4,802
of 5,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,742
of 177,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Biology and Evolution
#34
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.