↓ Skip to main content

Physicians' Attitudes Toward Using Deception to Resolve Difficult Ethical Problems

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, May 1989
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Physicians' Attitudes Toward Using Deception to Resolve Difficult Ethical Problems
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, May 1989
DOI 10.1001/jama.1989.03420200070040
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 40 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Student > Master 5 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Other 13 30%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 12%
Arts and Humanities 3 7%
Philosophy 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 5 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2006.
All research outputs
#7,591,124
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#23,594
of 42,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,551
of 21,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#34
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.