↓ Skip to main content

Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: The Potential Critical Role of Emergency Medicine in Prevention

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Emergency Medicine, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: The Potential Critical Role of Emergency Medicine in Prevention
Published in
Journal of Emergency Medicine, August 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.jemermed.2010.05.042
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Delivery of critical care within a certain window of opportunity is paramount in many disease states, and providing the right care to these patients at the right time in the Emergency Department (ED) can significantly reduce mortality. However, aggressive treatment of these patients often requires endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation either in the pre-hospital or ED phase of care. Care of mechanically ventilated patients in the ED is not trivial or without potential complications, including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 140 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Other 10 7%
Other 34 24%
Unknown 36 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 39 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,963,029
of 34,575,175 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Emergency Medicine
#304
of 4,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,428
of 151,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Emergency Medicine
#3
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,575,175 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.