↓ Skip to main content

Public Dental Safety Net in Iowa: Capacity and Readiness for Health Care Reform

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of health care for the poor and underserved (Online), January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Public Dental Safety Net in Iowa: Capacity and Readiness for Health Care Reform
Published in
Journal of health care for the poor and underserved (Online), January 2016
DOI 10.1353/hpu.2016.0084
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Examine the current capacity of Iowa's public dental safety net and organizational readiness for implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). We surveyed Iowa Community Health Center (CHC) dental clinics for factors related to clinic capacity and organizational readiness for ACA-related change. With 14 clinics (93%) responding, clinics had means of 13,064 patient visits and 23% broken appointments in 2012. Seventy percent of clinics reported high confidence in their ability to respond to changes associated with health care reform. However, over 60% agreed that current circumstances limited their ability to respond to these challenges. CHC dental clinics in Iowa understand ACA-related changes regarding their patient population, but are limited in their ability make needed changes in response to increased demand. This may affect the clinics' transition into an environment with increased demand for dental services as a result of Medicaid expansion in Iowa.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 24%
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2018.
All research outputs
#27,727,448
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from Journal of health care for the poor and underserved (Online)
#1,207
of 1,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#335,186
of 446,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of health care for the poor and underserved (Online)
#59
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.