↓ Skip to main content

How could depression guidelines be made more relevant and applicable to primary care?

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
How could depression guidelines be made more relevant and applicable to primary care?
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, May 2009
DOI 10.3399/bjgp09x420581
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Singapore 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 85 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Other 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 39%
Psychology 14 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 18 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2016.
All research outputs
#2,151,864
of 34,559,526 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#967
of 5,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,213
of 149,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,559,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.