You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Oral Acute and Chronic Feeding Toxicity Tests on Green Patina (Basic Cupric Carbonate) in Rats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Shokuhin eiseigaku zasshi Journal of the Food Hygienic Society of Japan, January 1985
|
| DOI | 10.3358/shokueishi.26.605 |
| Authors |
Toshiaki OCHIAI, USUI Akio, Kiyoshi MATSUMOTO, Kiyoshi SEKITA, Katsushi NAITO, Yasushi KAWASAKI, Tsuyoshi FURUYA, TOBE Masuo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2020.
All research outputs
#17,636,985
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Shokuhin eiseigaku zasshi Journal of the Food Hygienic Society of Japan
#306
of 531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,942
of 39,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Shokuhin eiseigaku zasshi Journal of the Food Hygienic Society of Japan
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 531 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.