You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Frequent burning causes large losses of carbon from deep soil layers in a temperate savanna
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Ecology, February 2020
|
DOI | 10.1111/1365-2745.13351 |
Authors |
Adam F. A. Pellegrini, Kendra K. McLauchlan, Sarah E. Hobbie, Michelle C. Mack, Abbey L. Marcotte, David M. Nelson, Steven S. Perakis, Peter B. Reich, Kyle Whittinghill |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 42% |
Germany | 1 | 5% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Puerto Rico | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 63% |
Scientists | 5 | 26% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 20% |
Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 18 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 18 | 24% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 21% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 26 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,795,257
of 23,195,584 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ecology
#523
of 3,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,481
of 360,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ecology
#12
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,195,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.