↓ Skip to main content

Improving Practices for Selecting a Subset of Important Predictors in Psychology: An Application to Predicting Pain

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 X users

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Improving Practices for Selecting a Subset of Important Predictors in Psychology: An Application to Predicting Pain
Published in
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, February 2020
DOI 10.1177/2515245919885617
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 19 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 19 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,462,455
of 28,812,439 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
#151
of 278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,265
of 390,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,812,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.