↓ Skip to main content

A Quasi-Experimental Study of After-Event Reviews and Leadership Development

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Psychology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
456 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Quasi-Experimental Study of After-Event Reviews and Leadership Development
Published in
Journal of Applied Psychology, September 2012
DOI 10.1037/a0028244
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We examine how structured reflection through after-event reviews (AERs) promotes experience-based leadership development and how people's prior experiences and personality attributes influence the impact of AERs on leadership development. We test our hypotheses in a time-lagged, quasi-experimental study that followed 173 research participants for 9 months and across 4 distinct developmental experiences. Findings indicate that AERs have a positive effect on leadership development, and this effect is accentuated when people are conscientious, open to experience, and emotionally stable and have a rich base of prior developmental experiences.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 456 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 440 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 109 24%
Student > Master 65 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 59 13%
Student > Bachelor 25 5%
Professor 24 5%
Other 69 15%
Unknown 105 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 142 31%
Psychology 115 25%
Social Sciences 38 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 2%
Arts and Humanities 6 1%
Other 31 7%
Unknown 116 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2024.
All research outputs
#6,167,842
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Psychology
#1,315
of 3,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,872
of 222,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Psychology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.