↓ Skip to main content

Comparing Patients’ Experiences with Electronic and Traditional Consultation: Results from a Multisite Survey

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparing Patients’ Experiences with Electronic and Traditional Consultation: Results from a Multisite Survey
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2020
DOI 10.1007/s11606-020-05703-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 35 45%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Engineering 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 36 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,169,068
of 28,971,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,081
of 9,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,651
of 391,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#74
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,971,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.