↓ Skip to main content

A Second Gilded Age? The Promises and Perils of an Analogy: Introduction

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Gilded Age & Progressive Era, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Second Gilded Age? The Promises and Perils of an Analogy: Introduction
Published in
Journal of the Gilded Age & Progressive Era, February 2020
DOI 10.1017/s1537781419000616
Authors

Daniel Wortel-London, Boyd Cothran

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,268,667
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Gilded Age & Progressive Era
#54
of 219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,576
of 383,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Gilded Age & Progressive Era
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.