↓ Skip to main content

Underestimating the unrepresented: Cognitive biases disadvantage pro se litigants in family law cases.

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology, Public Policy and Law, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Underestimating the unrepresented: Cognitive biases disadvantage pro se litigants in family law cases.
Published in
Psychology, Public Policy and Law, May 2020
DOI 10.1037/law0000229
Authors

Kathryn M. Kroeper, Victor D. Quintanilla, Michael Frisby, Nedim Yel, Amy G. Applegate, Steven J. Sherman, Mary C. Murphy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 32%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 9 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 27%
Psychology 3 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Unknown 11 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,002,842
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Psychology, Public Policy and Law
#187
of 530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,785
of 410,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology, Public Policy and Law
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.