↓ Skip to main content

Wheat Bran Abolishes the Inverse Relationship between Calcium Load Size and Absorption Fraction in Women

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nutrition, January 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Wheat Bran Abolishes the Inverse Relationship between Calcium Load Size and Absorption Fraction in Women
Published in
Journal of Nutrition, January 1996
DOI 10.1093/jn/126.1.303
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Fractional calcium absorption from varying intakes of calcium carbonate co-ingested with wheat bran, as well as alone, was measured in a randomized crossover study in healthy adult women. The calcium carbonate was intrinsically labeled with 45Ca. Absorption from the carbonate, ingested without bran, showed the expected inverse relationship to the logarithm of ingested load size (slope = -0.1199; not substantially different from the value previously reported for milk). At 0.5 mmol calcium load, fractional absorption averaged 0.769 +/- 0.134, whereas at 12.5 mmol load it averaged 0.378 +/- 0.069. In contrast, fractional absorption from calcium carbonate co-ingested with 40 g of a cereal product containing 16 g wheat bran, across a calcium load range from 0.5 to 15.5 mmol, was essentially constant (mean for all loads: 0.230 +/- 0.069). Thus, the calcium-binding capacity of the bran cereal altered the usual inverse relationship between calcium load and fractional absorption. In vitro calcium binding to the bran cereal was linear over a wide range of calcium levels. This suggests that binding of calcium to one or more components of the bran cereal is sufficient to explain the reduced absorption demonstrated in vivo.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 26%
Professor 4 17%
Other 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2012.
All research outputs
#10,128,747
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nutrition
#6,191
of 12,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,714
of 116,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nutrition
#22
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.